Before you sign up for the number, try to kill the territory.

Five questions that tell you whether the patch can make the number, or whether you are being asked to grow where nobody could. For sellers. One minute. No account names.

Spend · Accounts · Base · Access · History

The five questions, and what each one disproves

A quota is a claim about a territory. Before you accept it, check whether the territory agrees.

SPEND: Is the money there twice over? Agency budgets, program lines, contract ceilings. If the total addressable spend is not at least double the number, you are not selling, you are hoping for share you have no reason to expect.

ACCOUNTS: Can you name ten? Not a list from the CRM. Ten accounts you personally expect to buy this year, with a reason for each. If you cannot get to ten, your manager should hear that in January, not October.

BASE: Is there anything to grow? A territory with installed base has a floor. A territory that is all new logos has a ceiling and no floor. Know which one you have, and put the inherited number on paper so nobody counts it twice.

ACCESS: Can you get in the door? A relationship, a partner who owns the account, a contract vehicle they already buy through. One route per account. Without one, the account is a name.

HISTORY: Has anyone done it? Find the last person who had the patch. If nobody has ever made this number here, you are the experiment, and you should be paid like one.

What to do with the verdict

A bad territory verdict is not an excuse. It is a document. Take it to your manager in the first month, with the sizing behind it, and ask for one of three things: a different patch, a different number, or a different plan for how the gap gets filled. Managers respect the seller who does the math in January. They have no patience for the one who discovers it in Q4.

A good verdict is worse news. The number is there. Now it is on you.

Mark Flournoy

Hi, I'm Mark.

I led Partner Sales Teams at AWS for six years, sold at F5, Red Hat, STEC and Virident, and before that spent 20 years as a Marine. I've been the seller defending the deal, the manager poking holes in it, the partner trying to help, and the guy explaining the forecast one level up.

These days I work with sales leaders in the middle: responsible for the number, responsible for the people, and getting pressure from both directions. This isn't a big consulting firm. It's just me.

A few things I see a lot

Rarely just one of them. Usually a couple at the same time, quietly making each other worse.

The pipeline looks better than it really is. Plenty of opportunities in the CRM, but once you ask about budget, timing and who actually wants the thing, the number gets smaller fast.

The partner likes you, but nothing is happening. Plenty of meetings, maybe a joint deck. Nobody can point to the accounts where the two companies are actually trying to win something together.

The team is busy, but there isn't much rhythm. The forecast call happens. The one-on-ones happen. Nobody is sure what the team should do differently this week to make next quarter better.

The number from above doesn't match what you see below. Leadership has a growth number. Your team has a pipeline. You're the one who has to explain why they disagree without sounding like you've already given up.

A team can be behind plan for a lot of reasons. One seller needs help getting in front of customers. Another is doing fine and wants you to stay out of the way. Someone else thinks the year is already gone. Sometimes the rep is fine and the territory, the comp plan or the pipeline they inherited isn't. The useful part is figuring out which one you're dealing with before you fix the wrong one. That's what the tools on this site do for one deal and one pipeline. It's also most of what I do.

Three ways to work together

Talk it through. 20 minutes, free. Bring a deal, a pipeline, or a rep you can't figure out. I'll ask a few questions and tell you what I'd look at first. Sometimes the answer is "I wouldn't change much." That's useful too.

Work through one problem. 90 minutes, paid. One issue, properly: a deal, a territory, a partner, a capture plan, a seller. You get a short write-up afterward so there's something to work from.

Run the review with me. Monthly or for a few weeks. I sit in your pipeline reviews, ask the five questions, and stay involved while the team works the answers.

Free, 20 minutes, no pitch. If I don't think I can help, I'll tell you. I also build fedhoo, a federal market research tool.

Other things worth killing

Same five-question idea, pointed at the other places a quarter goes wrong.

Kill My Pipeline. For managers. 3X is a rule of thumb; your win rate says what you actually need. Target, pipeline, win rate, and the gap.

Kill My Rep. For managers. Before you write them up, find out whether it is the rep, the territory, the comp plan, or the year they have given up on.

Kill My Partner. For partner managers. Is this partner selling with you, or on your slide?

Kill My Territory. For sellers. Can the patch make the number, or are you being asked to grow where nobody could?

Questions

Does anything I enter leave my device?
No. The five answers are scored in your browser. No account, no CRM connection, no API call. The site counts page views with Google Analytics and never sends your answers. Nothing else leaves the page unless you choose to share a result.
Is this just a way to argue about quota?
It is a way to argue about quota with evidence instead of feelings, which is the only version of that argument anyone has ever won.
What if I am new and do not know the territory yet?
Then most answers will be sort of, and the verdict will say so. Run it again in 60 days. The gap between the two runs is what you learned.
What about the coverage math?
That is the other tool. Once you know the territory can produce, Kill My Pipeline tells you how much pipeline it has to produce.